
Dreame
L10s Ultra Gen 2
L&B Tech Reviews: 5/6 and 2 more reviews
£289.00at Argos
See pricesBuy the L10s Ultra Gen 3; reviewers were happier with its pickup, and its dock does one more chore for you.
Updated

Dreame
L&B Tech Reviews: 5/6 and 2 more reviews
£289.00at Argos
See prices
Dreame
Computer Bild: 1.7, good (1 is best) and 1 more review
£479.00at Currys
See pricesThe older of the two, still sold alongside the Gen 3. Its dock empties the bin, washes the mops in unheated water and dries them, and reviewers liked its mopping and its value. You give up a lot of suction on paper, you brush the dock's washboard by hand, and testers saw hair wrap the roller and cat hair blown about. With no camera, it drove straight into fake pet mess in one test.
The newer model, with a much higher suction claim and a dock that cleans its own washboard. Two German tests found strong pickup on hard floors and carpet. It still has no camera, and testers split on whether it dodges small things. Long hair tangles its brush, stubborn stains need repeat passes, and its onboard bin is a little smaller than the Gen 2's.
Trusted Reviews found carpet pickup excellent and lifted dried coffee and red wine easily, but its whole human-hair test ended up wrapped round the roller. Tom's Guide was cooler on hardwood, where cereal was left behind and the wheels crushed Cheerios, and it saw cat hair blown around and puzzling routes. In a family flat, L&B Tech Reviews was happy with the daily clean, though mop drying buzzed for two to three hours. All three liked the dock and the value, and Trusted Reviews watched it drive straight into fake pet mess.
Computer Bild put it top of its list of budget robot vacuum-mops, after it collected 97.4g of a 100g mix of cat litter, muesli and wood shavings. Notebookcheck called it a lot of robot for the money, especially on carpet, but found long hair tangled the brush. Obstacles split them: Computer Bild saw it avoid cables, socks and dog mess, while Notebookcheck watched it catch building bricks and shoelaces. Both found stubborn stains needed repeat passes, and both warn about doorway thresholds over about 2cm.
On paper the Gen 3 has two and a half times the suction, and its tests lean the same way. Computer Bild collected almost all of its debris mix, and Notebookcheck found the extra power paid off on smooth floors and short pile. The Gen 2's results were patchier, with Tom's Guide seeing cereal left on hardwood. These were different tests in different homes, so treat it as a lean rather than a measured gap.
Both docks empty the bin, wash the mops in unheated water, dry them and refill the robot. On the Gen 2, Trusted Reviews and Tom's Guide both note you brush the washboard by hand. The Gen 3 adds a self-cleaning washboard, per Dreame. Dreame also claims up to 100 days between bag changes on the Gen 3, against its own 60 to 75 days for the Gen 2.
Neither is a good pick for long hair. Trusted Reviews found its entire human-hair test wrapped round the Gen 2's roller, and Notebookcheck found long hair tangled the Gen 3's brush more often than it would like. Which brush comes in the box can vary by bundle, so don't choose the older model to avoid tangles. Short dog hair caused the Gen 3 no trouble.
Both feel their way with a single laser sensor at the front. Trusted Reviews saw the Gen 2 steer round packaging but drive straight into fake pet mess. The Gen 3 split its testers: Computer Bild saw it avoid cables, socks and dog mess, while Notebookcheck watched it run into bricks and shoelaces. Clear the floor before either one runs.
The Gen 3's onboard bin is a little smaller, 250ml against 300ml, and Tom's Guide already found the Gen 2's nearly full after each test. The Gen 3 adds Matter support for smart-home systems, per Notebookcheck. Both lift their mops 10.5mm over carpet and neither can leave them in the dock, so set no-mop zones for deep rugs.
Up to five shops for each, cheapest first. We read every price on the shop’s own page.
| Spec | L10s Ultra Gen 2 | L10s Ultra Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (claimed) | 10,000Pa | 25,000Pa |
| Obstacle avoidance | Single laser, no camera | Single laser, no camera |
| Mopping | Two spinning pads, one extends for edges, 10.5mm lift | Two spinning pads, one extends up to 4cm, 10.5mm lift |
| Dock | Auto-empty, unheated mop wash, hot-air drying, water and detergent refill Washboard is brushed by hand | Auto-empty, unheated mop wash, hot-air drying, water and detergent refill, self-cleaning washboard |
| Time between bag changes (claimed) | 60–75 days | Up to 100 days |
| Robot bin | 300ml | 250ml |
| Battery | 5,200mAh | 5,200mAh Dreame claims up to 231 minutes vacuuming only |
| Height | 9.72cm | 9.7cm |
| Dock size | 450 × 350 × 590.5mm | 457 × 340 × 590mm |
The Gen 3 has a much higher suction claim, 25,000Pa against 10,000Pa, a dock that cleans its own washboard and Matter support, per Notebookcheck. Its robot bin is a little smaller. Otherwise they're close: same height, same battery, no camera on either, and mops that lift over carpet but can't stay in the dock.
If the price gap is small, yes. Its pickup impressed both Computer Bild and Notebookcheck, and the self-cleaning washboard saves you brushing it by hand. If the Gen 2 is much cheaper on the day, it still mops well; Trusted Reviews lifted dried coffee and red wine easily.
Only low ones. Tom's Guide saw the Gen 2 struggle with a door threshold of around 1.4cm before getting over it. Computer Bild found the Gen 3 crossed 1.5cm easily but couldn't climb higher steps. Dreame's UK pages give no climbing height for either, so plan for a ramp if yours are taller.
No. Both lift their pads 10.5mm when they cross carpet, but neither can leave them behind, as Trusted Reviews confirms for the Gen 2. Notebookcheck suggests vacuuming carpeted rooms first and mopping the rest afterwards.