QV 35S

Tom’s Guide found clean hard floors, useful removal of muddy footprints and easy room mapping during a month of use. Carpet detection lifted the mop appropriately in that home. These are practical strengths for an owner seeking a convenient regular cleaning routine.

The same publication’s high-pile testing left substantial hair and small debris behind. That is an important limit on claims that the QV 35S is especially good for pet homes: it may reduce visible daily debris without removing fur trapped deep in a thick carpet.

One owner’s week-long account praised quieter operation and useful mopping but disliked vacuum pickup and missed cabinet edges. That report does not outweigh every positive test, nor establish a widespread defect. It does add a concrete reason to check edge coverage during an initial home trial.

Tom’s Guide completed its ground floor without a charging interruption. The owner account also shows that stronger settings do not automatically resolve every missed area. Our interpretation is to shortlist it for predominantly hard flooring, while comparing alternatives if embedded hair and tightly recessed edges are the biggest sources of manual work.