360 Vis Nav

TechRadar liked the dirt collected during home use and found the side duct useful along walls. RTINGS saw weaker whole-room results because erratic routes left areas untouched, with poor corner coverage. A powerful cleaning head only helps where the robot actually travels. We would judge the completed room rather than the amount of debris visible in the bin alone.

RTINGS found disappointing carpet-hair removal and incomplete coverage. TechRadar was more enthusiastic about pickup, while acknowledging navigation pauses and difficulty with corners. These results do not support a confident universal recommendation for carpet-heavy homes. The discrepancy is important even if an individual home test looks impressive.

TechRadar measured only about 13–15 minutes in Boost during its tests, compared with roughly 47 minutes in Auto. Higher power can therefore turn a larger job into cleaning interrupted by recharging. Its reviewer also found the displayed dust map difficult to interpret. Those observations matter for buyers hoping to start a single quick whole-floor clean.

TechRadar praised the canister design and straightforward controls. Neither reviewed package mops or empties itself; RTINGS identifies the dock as charging-only. Our interpretation is that a discounted unit can make sense for someone who specifically wants vacuuming and accepts regular handling, but its unusual design does not remove the navigation and runtime compromises.